Which statement correctly describes 64-bit aggregates in relation to FlexVols?

Which statement correctly describes 64-bit aggregates in relation to FlexVols?

• A. They permit 1000 FlexVols on a controller
• B. They permit 500 FlexVols on a controller
• C. They permit 6400 FlexVols on a controller
• D. They permit 64000 FlexVols on a controller

Answer: (B)

64-bit aggregates increase the number of FlexVols you can host on a single controller by expanding the addressing space, which removes the tight limitations of older 32-bit aggregates. In this 7-Mode context, the documented limit for FlexVols per controller with 64-bit aggregates is 500. That makes the statement about 500 FlexVols per controller the best fit, since the other figures (1000, 6400, 64000) exceed the supported per-controller limit and aren’t consistent with the documented scalability for 64-bit aggregates. Remember, this limit is per controller and reflects practical scalability and management considerations for FlexVol deployments.

64-bit aggregates increase the number of FlexVols you can host on a single controller by expanding the addressing space, which removes the tight limitations of older 32-bit aggregates. In this 7-Mode context, the documented limit for FlexVols per controller with 64-bit aggregates is 500. That makes the statement about 500 FlexVols per controller the best fit, since the other figures (1000, 6400, 64000) exceed the supported per-controller limit and aren’t consistent with the documented scalability for 64-bit aggregates. Remember, this limit is per controller and reflects practical scalability and management considerations for FlexVol deployments.